Skip to main content
LimbAtlas home

Search providers, surgeons, facilities, countries, cities, techniques, devices and guides. Results are ordered by how closely they match what you type — never by provider quality or sponsorship.

Or browse

My Research
Methods & devices

Internal lengthening nails

What an internal lengthening nail is, how it differs structurally from an external frame, and why follow-up and rehabilitation still apply — a structural explainer that does not compare outcomes.

By LimbAtlas editorial team

Reading time
4 min
Sources
6
Last reviewed
Updated

Key points

  • An internal lengthening nail sits inside the bone and is lengthened gradually after the operation, on the same principle as an external frame.
  • Named systems are adjusted in different ways; the literature describes FITBONE as motorized and PRECICE as magnetically driven.
  • Follow-up and rehabilitation still apply, and internal nails have complications of their own.
  • This guide makes no claim that internal nails are safer, faster or more effective than other methods.

What an internal lengthening nail is

An internal lengthening nail is a device implanted inside a long bone that can be lengthened gradually after the operation. The orthopaedic literature calls it an intramedullary nail, meaning it sits within the bone. AAOS patient information describes the surgeon cutting the bone and implanting an expandable metal rod; as the rod lengthens, the bone segments are gradually pulled apart and new bone grows in the space created.

This is the same principle of gradual lengthening, distraction osteogenesis, that external frames rely on. A published review of limb lengthening describes the methods as having evolved from external fixators to lengthening intramedullary nails while still resting on the same biological principles. What differs is where the device sits and how the lengthening is driven.

The structural difference from an external frame

An external fixator is a frame outside the limb, connected to the bone with wires or pins that pass through the skin. An internal nail sits inside the body: Cleveland Clinic patient information describes it as a device the surgeon places inside the bone that is not visible outside the body, and a 2026 systematic review describes these devices as eliminating the need for external hardware.

The same review notes that these devices introduce specific risks of their own, related to their motorized and telescopic mechanisms. This guide describes the structural difference only. It does not state that either approach is safer, less painful, faster or more effective — those are clinical questions for a treating surgeon.

How the lengthening is controlled

Earlier internal nails lengthened through mechanical mechanisms; the published review describes one early design that required rotation of the limb to lengthen, and describes current motorized nails as not requiring rotation. A 2021 systematic review describes FITBONE as a motorized nail and PRECICE as a magnetically driven nail — named here as technical examples from the literature, not as a recommendation of any product.

Patient information from Cleveland Clinic describes using a remote control that rotates the rod inside the bone, and Hospital for Special Surgery describes an external magnet that connects to a magnet within the rod. How much lengthening takes place, and on what schedule, is set by the treating team for the individual patient and is not described here.

Follow-up and rehabilitation still apply

An internal device does not remove the need for monitoring or rehabilitation. AAOS patient information describes both internal and external lengthening as requiring regular follow-up visits and extensive rehabilitation, including physical therapy and home exercise. Cleveland Clinic describes the care team using X-rays to check new bone growth and adjusting treatment if it is progressing too quickly or too slowly.

How rehabilitation is organised — on-site, through a partner or remotely — differs between providers and is covered in the guide Understanding rehabilitation.

Device complications and implant removal

Internal nails have complications of their own. A 2021 systematic review of complications with two motorized nail systems, covering 983 lengthened bone segments, found that device and bone complications were the types most often reported. Its authors caution that, because no standardised method of reporting complications exists, the true rate might be different. A 2026 systematic review focused specifically on failures of the lengthening mechanism, such as jamming, and reported that these were usually managed with further surgery. This guide does not quote complication rates, because figures pooled across different patients, devices and study designs do not describe any individual's risk.

Cleveland Clinic patient information describes the lengthening device being removed in a further surgical procedure after the new bone has hardened, and the 2021 review classifies complications by whether they occurred before or after implant removal. Whether and when removal is planned is a question for the treating team.

What this guide does not claim

This guide does not claim that internal nails are safer, faster, less painful or more effective than external fixation or hybrid methods, and it makes no claims about typical timelines, costs or complication rates. It does not describe who is a suitable candidate: individual suitability for any method depends on clinical factors that only a qualified orthopaedic surgeon can assess for a specific patient.

Questions worth asking a provider about this method

If a provider lists internal nail lengthening among its treatment methods, the questions below can help make its answers comparable with other providers'. They are prompts for your own research, not a checklist of correct answers.

Questions about internal nail methods6 items

  • Which specific device does the team propose for my case, and how long has the team used it?
  • How is the lengthening controlled, who carries out the adjustments, and how is progress monitored?
  • What follow-up visits and rehabilitation are planned during and after lengthening?
  • Which device-related complications does the team discuss with patients, and how would they be managed?
  • Is removal of the nail planned, and how would that be decided?
  • What alternatives were considered, including external fixation or hybrid techniques?

Sources

  1. 1.
    Systematic review of complications with externally controlled motorized intramedullary bone lengthening nails (FITBONE and PRECICE) in 983 segments (external site, opens in a new tab)

    Acta Orthopaedicadoi.orgPublished Accessed

    Frost MW, Rahbek O, Traerup J, Ceccotti AA, Kold S. 2021;92(1):119–126. Full text on PMC7919879.

  2. 2.
    Mechanism Failures in Externally Controlled Motorized Intramedullary Lengthening Nails: A Systematic Review (external site, opens in a new tab)

    JBJS Open Accessdoi.orgPublished Accessed

    Kostin E, Kitsis P, Charalampidis C, Orfanos I. 2026;11(1):e25.00327. Full text on PMC13004228.

  3. 3.
    Limb lengthening history, evolution, complications and current concepts (external site, opens in a new tab)

    Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatologydoi.orgPublished Accessed

    Hosny GA. 2020;21(1):3. Narrative review.

  4. 4.
    Lower Limb Length Discrepancy (external site, opens in a new tab)

    OrthoInfo, American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeonsorthoinfo.orgAccessed

    Patient information on limb length discrepancy; cited here only for its general description of lengthening methods, follow-up and rehabilitation.

  5. 5.
    Limb Lengthening Surgery: Procedure, Process & Recovery (external site, opens in a new tab)

    Cleveland Clinicmy.clevelandclinic.orgAccessed

  6. 6.
    Height Surgery (Leg Extension Surgery) FAQs (external site, opens in a new tab)

    Hospital for Special Surgeryhss.eduAccessed

    Cited only for general statements about rehabilitation and weight-bearing instructions, not for any institution-specific figures.

About this guide

Status
Published — checked against the sources listed; not clinically reviewed
Written by
LimbAtlas editorial team
Published
Last reviewed against sources
Last updated

LimbAtlas provides educational information and does not replace advice from a qualified medical professional. This guide does not recommend a specific provider or method; discuss any medical decision with a clinician who can assess your individual situation.

How guides are written and maintained: editorial policy · medical disclaimer

  • Methods & devices

    Internal and external limb lengthening

    How the four techniques LimbAtlas records differ in where the lengthening hardware sits — inside the bone, outside the limb, or both — and what that structural difference does and does not tell you.

    4 min readReviewed

  • Methods & devices

    Understanding limb lengthening devices

    How a named device such as PRECICE, FITBONE or the Taylor Spatial Frame differs from a device type and from a treatment technique — and how to read the device information on a LimbAtlas profile.

    4 min readReviewed

  • Recovery & rehabilitation

    Understanding rehabilitation

    What rehabilitation involves during limb lengthening in general terms, how providers arrange it, and what to ask about a program before comparing providers on it.

    3 min readReviewed

Continue your research

Compare providers structurally by organisation type, care model, treatment method and rehabilitation and accommodation support.

Compare a shortlist side by side

Explore the provider directory